As all new investigational drugs and biologics must undergo clinical trials on human subjects to demonstrate safety and efficacy prior to approval for sale in the United States, pharmaceutical manufacturers sponsor trials involving investigators and patients both inside and outside the United States. The data in support of  a particular product’s approval therefore comes from both U.S. and foreign clinical trials. The FDA, as mandated by the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act is charged with the responsibility of ensuring the rights, safety and well-being of subjects who participate in these trials and of verifying that the clinical trial data collected are both accurate and reliable.

In the Report, the FDA found that 80 percent of approved marketing applications for drugs and biologics contained data from foreign clinical trials. Further, over half of clinical trial subjects and sites were located outside the United States.  Astonishingly, the FDA inspected clinical investigators at less then 1 percent of foreign sites!

For more information about qui tam law and pharmaceutical fraud, contact Nolan and Auerbach, PA.

According to the agreement, Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical LLC has agreed to plead guilty to a misdemeanor and pay a $6.14 million criminal fine for the misbranding of Topamax in violation of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Topamax as an anti-epileptic drug, for the treatment of partial onset seizures, but not for any psychiatric use.

The government alleged that Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical promoted the sale of Topamax for off-label psychiatric uses by hiring outside physicians to join sales representatives on their visits to health care providers’ offices, to speak at meetings and dinners about prescribing Topamax for unapproved uses and doses.

In addition to the criminal fine, Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals will pay $75.37 million to resolve civil allegations under the False Claims Act that they illegally promoted Topamax and caused false claims to be submitted to government health care programs for a variety of psychiatric uses that were not medically accepted indications and therefore not covered by those programs. The federal share of the civil settlement is $50,688,483.52, and the state Medicaid share of the civil settlement is $24,681,516.48.

The civil settlement resolves two lawsuits filed under the qui tam, or whistleblower provisions of the False Claims Act.

For the full press release, go to: http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2010/April/10-civ-500.html. For more information about qui tam law and health care fraud, contact Nolan and Auerbach, PA.

For the full announcement, go to: http://www.justice.gov/ag/speeches/2010/ag-speech-100427.html.

For more information about qui tam law and health care fraud, contact Nolan and Auerbach, PA.

For more information about qui tam law and health care fraud, contact Nolan and Auerbach, PA.

Under this agreement, the proceeds from the settlement will be split between the federal government and various states. The settlement resolves a lawsuit brought by a whistleblower under the qui tam or whistleblower provisions of the False Claims Act, according to a DOJ press release.

For the full press release, go to: http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2010/March/10-civ-269.html. For more information about qui tam law and health care fraud, contact Nolan and Auerbach, PA.

South Texas Health System, a McAllen, Texas-based hospital group, has agreed to pay the United States $27.5 million to settle claims that it violated the False Claims Act, the Anti-Kickback Statute and the Stark Statute between 1999 and 2006. The hospital group, owned by Pennsylvania-based Universal Health Services Inc., allegedly paid illegal compensation to doctors in order to induce them to refer patients to hospitals within the group, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) announced October 30, 2009.

The settlement involved allegations that the defendants had entered into financial relationships with several doctors in McAllen in order to induce them to refer patients to the defendants’ hospitals. The government alleged that these payments were disguised through a series of sham contracts, including medical directorships and lease agreements.

The settlement resolves allegations raised against both the parent and the subsidiary in a qui tam or whistleblower lawsuit, according to the DOJ.

For the full press release, go to: http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2009/October/09-civ-1175.html.

For more information about qui tam law and health care fraud, contact Nolan and Auerbach, PA

To review the draft guidance, go to: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=09000064809f1ed1.

For more information about qui tam law and health care fraud, contact Nolan and Auerbach, PA.