The 10th largest pharmaceutical company in the world, Eli Lilly & Co. admitted to off-label use of Zyprexa; specifically, the organization promoted the drug for dementia in elderly populations, a usage that was not approved by the Food and Drug Administration. Additionally, Lilly trained its sales force to disregard the law by promoting Zyprexa for off-label uses. Thus over a period of two years (September 1999-March 2001), Lilly earned “hundreds of millions of dollars” through consistent criminal violations of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.

Of the civil settlement, $438 million will go to the federal government and up to $362 million will be allocated to states included in the settlement.  As a component of its restitution, Lilly will undergo five years of U.S. monitoring against future lawbreaking.  Independent from the current settlement, the company also faces lawsuits across twelve states for improper and off-label drug marketing.

This monumental case was initiated by Lilly sales representatives who in 2003 filed complaints against Lilly under the terms of the federal False Claims Act.  For their actions, the whistleblowers will receive over $78 million— or 18 percent of the settlement— in addition to possible shares of state settlements.

To learn more go here. or if you have information about Pharmaceutical Fraud contact Nolan & Auerbach P.A.

To read more click here.

For more information click here.

In the Op-Ed section of the April 25, 2006, Los Angeles Times, Shannon Brownlee suggests that if consumers want honesty, clinical research for drug studies need to be publicly funded. She cites that, “…two-thirds of clinical trials and three-quarters of the papers published in the top medical journals commercially funded, the drug industry has gained unprecedented leverage over what doctors and patients know — and don’t know — about drugs.” While researchers may dispute the implication that their results are manipulated, Ms. Brownlee cites the following: “The recent case of drugs known as atypical antipsychotics is instructive. These new and expensive drugs, with sales of about $10 billion annually, are used to treat serious mental illnesses such as schizophrenia. Earlier this year, the American Journal of Psychiatry published an analysis of 30 separate trials involving head-to-head comparisons of five drugs. Nine out of 10 times, the drug made by the company that funded the study came out on top. When Eli Lilly, the maker of Zyprexa, funded five studies of its drug, Zyprexa was found superior in all five. But when Janssen, the maker of Risperdal, ran its studies, Risperdal came out ahead.”
She suggests that,”.. If we want high-quality medical care, dozens of other drugs — as well as medical devices and non-drug treatments should be subjected to… noncommercial scrutiny.”