<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pharma 101 - Pharmaceutical Fraud &#187; off label</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pharmaceutical-kickbacks.com/category/off-label/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pharmaceutical-kickbacks.com</link>
	<description>Information &#38; Insight On Qui Tam Lawsuits Based Upon Unlawful Kickbacks, Marketing &#38; Pricing Conduct.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 01:03:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Grassley Probes into Ghostwriting Practices that May Result in Pharmaceutical Fraud</title>
		<link>http://pharmaceutical-kickbacks.com/grassley-probes-into-ghostwriting-practices-that-may-result-in-pharmaceutical-fraud/</link>
		<comments>http://pharmaceutical-kickbacks.com/grassley-probes-into-ghostwriting-practices-that-may-result-in-pharmaceutical-fraud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 14:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nolan and Auerbach</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmaceutical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[off label]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ghostwriting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[off label drug marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmaceutical Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmaceutical industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pharmaceutical-kickbacks.com/?p=157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[United States Senator Charles E. Grassley of Iowa has asked eight leading medical journals to describe their ghostwriting policies and practices. The inquiry is part of his broader effort to establish transparency with regard to financial relationships between the pharmaceutical industry and medical professionals, according to a July 2, 2009 press release by the senator. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>United States Senator Charles E. Grassley of Iowa has asked eight leading medical journals to describe their ghostwriting policies and practices. The inquiry is part of his broader effort to establish transparency with regard to financial relationships between the pharmaceutical industry and medical professionals, according to a July 2, 2009 press release by the senator. Such financial relationships can lead to pharmaceutical fraud practices, such as off-label marketing.</p>
<p>In December, Grassley wrote to Wyeth and DesignWrite, a medical education and communications company, regarding allegations that Wyeth hired DesignWrite to draft articles promoting the company&#8217;s hormone therapy products and seek academic investigators to sign on as the primary authors. Previously, Grassley had written to Merck and Scientific Therapeutics Information, a medical publishing company, regarding similar allegations reported in the Journal of the American Medical Association related to articles on Merck&#8217;s VIOXX studies.</p>
<p>He sent the letter on July 1 to the American Journal of Medicine, the Annals of Internal Medicine, the Annual Review of Medicine, the Archives of Internal Medicine, Nature Medicine, PLoS Medicine, The Journal of the American Medical Association and The New England Journal of Medicine. Grassley asked for the editors&#8217; written responses by July 22, 2009.</p>
<p>For the full press release, go to: <a title="http://finance.senate.gov/press/Gpress/2009/prg070209.pdf" href="http://finance.senate.gov/press/Gpress/2009/prg070209.pdf" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/finance.senate.gov/press/Gpress/2009/prg070209.pdf?referer=');">http://finance.senate.gov/press/Gpress/2009/prg070209.pdf</a>.</p>
<p>For more information about qui tam law and health care fraud, contact <a href="http://www.whistleblowerfirm.com/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.whistleblowerfirm.com/?referer=');">Nolan and Auerbach, PA.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pharmaceutical-kickbacks.com/grassley-probes-into-ghostwriting-practices-that-may-result-in-pharmaceutical-fraud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Effect on Off-Label Marketing in the 2010 Budget Details?</title>
		<link>http://pharmaceutical-kickbacks.com/effect-on-off-label-marketing-in-the-2010-budget-details/</link>
		<comments>http://pharmaceutical-kickbacks.com/effect-on-off-label-marketing-in-the-2010-budget-details/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 01:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nolan and Auerbach</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pharmaceutical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[off label]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Off-label use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmaceutical Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Food and Drug Administration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pharmaceutical-kickbacks.com/?p=139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Department of Health and Human Services recently released its budget proposal for 2010. As it relates to the FDA, HHS is looking to build
on the  $1.1billion included in the recovery Act for comparative effectiveness research.  The funds requested will continue efforts to produce state-of-the-science information on what medical treatments work best for a given [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Department of Health and Human Services recently released its budget proposal for 2010. As it relates to the FDA, HHS is looking to build</p>
<p>on the  $1.1billion included in the recovery Act for comparative effectiveness research.  The funds requested will continue efforts to produce state-of-the-science information on what medical treatments work best for a given condition.</p>
<p>Not only will these  findings enhance medical decision-making by patients and their physicians,  they will likely  close the door a little bit more to the success of off-label marketing of pharmaceuticals for indications that have little to no science to back up the claims of efficacy. Physicians will hopefully have a readily available source from which to compare treatments and drugs.</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pharmaceutical-kickbacks.com/effect-on-off-label-marketing-in-the-2010-budget-details/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eli Lilly Pays Record Fine for Off-Label Drug Marketing</title>
		<link>http://pharmaceutical-kickbacks.com/eli-lilly-pays-record-fine-for-off-label-drug-marketing/</link>
		<comments>http://pharmaceutical-kickbacks.com/eli-lilly-pays-record-fine-for-off-label-drug-marketing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 20:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nolan and Auerbach</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[off label]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eli Lilly & Co]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eli Lilly and Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[False Claims Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[off label drug marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[off label drug use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmaceutical Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmaceutical Kickbacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Food and Drug Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zyprexa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pharmaceutical-kickbacks.com/?p=19</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Philadelphia, Pennsylvania— Multiple news publications have confirmed that Eli Lilly &#38; Co. will, in the largest United States-imposed criminal fine on an individual company, pay $1.42 billion for the off-label marketing of its drug Zyprexa.   This record-breaking false claims case settlement was announced on January 16 by Acting U.S. Attorney Laurie Magid and Attorney General [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Philadelphia, Pennsylvania— Multiple news publications have confirmed that Eli Lilly &amp; Co. will, in the largest United States-imposed criminal fine on an individual company, pay $1.42 billion for the <a href="http://www.whistleblowerfirm.com/pharmaceutical-fraud/" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.whistleblowerfirm.com/pharmaceutical-fraud/?referer=');">off-label marketing</a> of its drug Zyprexa.   This record-breaking <a href="http://www.whistleblowerfirm.com/federalfalseclaimsact.html" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.whistleblowerfirm.com/federalfalseclaimsact.html?referer=');">false claims case</a> settlement was announced on January 16 by Acting U.S. Attorney Laurie Magid and Attorney General Michael Mukasey.  Lilly will reportedly make its guilty plea in the U.S. District Court of Philadelphia within the next few weeks.</p>
<p>The 10th largest pharmaceutical company in the world, Eli Lilly &amp; Co. admitted to off-label use of Zyprexa; specifically, the organization promoted the drug for dementia in elderly populations, a usage that was not approved by the Food and Drug Administration. Additionally, Lilly trained its sales force to disregard the law by promoting Zyprexa for off-label uses. Thus over a period of two years (September 1999-March 2001), Lilly earned “hundreds of millions of dollars” through consistent criminal violations of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.</p>
<p>Of the civil settlement, $438 million will go to the federal government and up to $362 million will be allocated to states included in the settlement.  As a component of its restitution, Lilly will undergo five years of U.S. monitoring against future lawbreaking.  Independent from the current settlement, the company also faces lawsuits across twelve states for improper and <a href="http://www.whistleblowerfirm.com/federalfalseclaimsact.html" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.whistleblowerfirm.com/federalfalseclaimsact.html?referer=');">off-label drug marketing</a>.</p>
<p>This monumental case was initiated by Lilly sales representatives who in 2003 filed complaints against Lilly under the terms of the <a href="http://www.whistleblowerfirm.com/federalfalseclaimsact.html" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.whistleblowerfirm.com/federalfalseclaimsact.html?referer=');">federal False Claims Act</a>.  For their actions, the whistleblowers will receive over $78 million— or 18 percent of the settlement— in addition to possible shares of state settlements.</p>
<p>To learn more go <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aGDAxYMRGIw0&amp;refer=home" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087_amp_sid=aGDAxYMRGIw0_amp_refer=home&amp;referer=');">here</a>. or if you have information about Pharmaceutical Fraud contact <a href="http://whistleblowerfirm.com/" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/whistleblowerfirm.com/?referer=');">Nolan &amp; Auerbach P.A</a>.</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><span class="zem-script more-related"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pharmaceutical-kickbacks.com/eli-lilly-pays-record-fine-for-off-label-drug-marketing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Off Label Marketing Costs Jazz Pharmaceuticals $20 Million</title>
		<link>http://pharmaceutical-kickbacks.com/off-label-marketing-costs-jazz-pharmaceuticals-20-million/</link>
		<comments>http://pharmaceutical-kickbacks.com/off-label-marketing-costs-jazz-pharmaceuticals-20-million/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 15:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nolan and Auerbach</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[off label]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[False Claims Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicaid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmaceutical Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whistleblower Lawsuit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pharmaceutical-kickbacks.com/?p=50</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (”Jazz”) has agreed to pay $20 million in order to resolve both criminal and civil investigations which were conducted by the United States Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York. Specifically, Jazz Subsidiary Orphan Medical, Inc. plead guilty to the off label, illegal marketing of Xyrum (also known as “GHB”) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (”Jazz”) has agreed to pay $20 million in order to resolve both criminal and civil investigations which were conducted by the United States Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York. Specifically, Jazz Subsidiary Orphan Medical, Inc. plead guilty to the <a href="http://www.whistleblowerfirm.com/pharmaceutical-fraud/" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.whistleblowerfirm.com/pharmaceutical-fraud/?referer=');">off label</a>, illegal marketing of Xyrum (also known as “GHB”) and agreed to pay $17.2 Million in restitution and penalties. Both Jazz and Orphan were also to pay an additional $2.8 Million through a Civil Settlement Agreement.</p>
<p>The government’s investigation of the pharmaceutical fraud began as the result of a <a href="http://www.whistleblowerfirm.com/qui-tam/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.whistleblowerfirm.com/qui-tam/?referer=');">whistleblower lawsuit</a> under the False Claims Act by a former sales representative for Orphan. Orphan engaged in a scheme to expand the market for Xyrum by marketing and promoting the drug to physicians for “off-label” use which included using a psychiatrist in promotional speaking engagements. The psychiatrist with the approval of Orphan sales personnel also showed physicians how to obtain reimbursement from Medicare and Medicaid for these unapproved uses. The criminal prosecution arose out of a criminal misbranding scheme by which physicians would write presciptions for Xyrum that were not reimburseable for Medicare and Medicaid.</p>
<p>“Pharmaceuticals manufactured under strict standards can still injure or kill if used for unapproved purposes. Here, the risk was not from willful abuse by users; it was from a concerted campaign by the manufacturer to push a drug for off-label uses. This posed a serious health risk and constitutes a serious crime,” said FBI Assistant Director-in-Charge, New York Field Office, Mark J. Mershon.<br />
To learn more click <a href="http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/nye/pr/2007/2007jul13a.html" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.usdoj.gov/usao/nye/pr/2007/2007jul13a.html?referer=');">here</a> or contact <a href="http://www.whistleblowerfirm.com/questionnaire.html" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.whistleblowerfirm.com/questionnaire.html?referer=');">Nolan &amp; Auerbach</a>.</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><span class="zem-script more-related"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pharmaceutical-kickbacks.com/off-label-marketing-costs-jazz-pharmaceuticals-20-million/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eli Lilly and Company in More Hot Water</title>
		<link>http://pharmaceutical-kickbacks.com/eli-lilly-and-company-in-more-hot-water/</link>
		<comments>http://pharmaceutical-kickbacks.com/eli-lilly-and-company-in-more-hot-water/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 14:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nolan and Auerbach</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmaceutical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[off label]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eli Lilly and Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Off-label use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmaceutical Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmaceutical industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unapproved drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unapproved uses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zyprexa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pharmaceutical-kickbacks.com/?p=29</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Montana is the latest state to sue Eli Lilly and Company, alleging that the company improperly and fraudulently marketed Zyprexa, an antipsychotic drug for unapproved uses.  According to Montana Attorney General Mike McGrath, Eli Lilly improperly promoted Zyprexa for off label use and illegally paid kickbacks to physicians.  Lilly created a sales force of 280 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Montana is the latest state to sue Eli Lilly and Company, alleging that the company improperly and fraudulently marketed Zyprexa, an antipsychotic drug for unapproved uses.  According to Montana Attorney General Mike McGrath, Eli Lilly improperly promoted Zyprexa for off label use and illegally paid kickbacks to physicians.  Lilly created a sales force of 280 persons according to the State of Montana complaint, “to promote Zyprexa exclusively for off-label uses, specifically for long-term-care facilities to maximize off-label use of Zyprexa sales.” Under federal laws, pharmaceutical companies are prohibited from marketing their drugs for off-label or unapproved uses. Lilly’s worldwide sales of Zyprexa were $4.36 billion in 2006.</p>
<p>To read more click <a href="http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070313/BUSINESS/703130343" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070313/BUSINESS/703130343&amp;referer=');">here.<br />
</a></p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><span class="zem-script more-related"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pharmaceutical-kickbacks.com/eli-lilly-and-company-in-more-hot-water/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>$30 Million Off-Label Case</title>
		<link>http://pharmaceutical-kickbacks.com/30-million-off-label-case/</link>
		<comments>http://pharmaceutical-kickbacks.com/30-million-off-label-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 16:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nolan and Auerbach</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[off label]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eli Lilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eli Lilly and Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Off-label use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmaceutical industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zyprexa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pharmaceutical-kickbacks.com/?p=66</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The State of Mississipi has filed a sweeping lawsuit against the pharmaceutical company Eli Lilly (see www.lilly.com) alleging the pharmaceutical compay illegally marketed Zyprexa (an antipsychotic drug) for off label uses, thereby defrauding the state of Mississippi in excess of $30 million. For more information, click here.


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The State of Mississipi has filed a sweeping lawsuit against the pharmaceutical company Eli Lilly (see www.lilly.com) alleging the pharmaceutical compay illegally marketed Zyprexa (an antipsychotic drug) for off label uses, thereby defrauding the state of Mississippi in excess of $30 million. For more information, click <a href="http://www.clarionledger.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060725/NEWS/607250351/1001/news" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.clarionledger.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060725/NEWS/607250351/1001/news&amp;referer=');">here.<br />
</a></p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><span class="zem-script more-related"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pharmaceutical-kickbacks.com/30-million-off-label-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
